Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:
Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence
On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:
- how the word is used
- frequency of use
- it is used more often in oral or written speech
- word translation options
- usage examples (several phrases with translation)
- etymology
What (who) is Concurrence - definition
NEED TO PROVE THE SIMULTANEOUS OCCURRENCE OF BOTH ACTUS REUS ("GUILTY ACTION") AND MENS REA ("GUILTY MIND"), TO CONSTITUTE A CRIME
Concur
concurrence
n.
1) complete, full concurrence
2) concurrence in
3) in concurrence with
4) with the concurrence of
Concurrence
·noun The act of concurring; a meeting or coming together; union; conjunction; combination.
II. Concurrence ·noun Agreement or consent, implying aid or contribution of power or influence; cooperation.
III. Concurrence ·noun A meeting of minds; agreement in opinion; union in design or act;
- implying joint approbation.
IV. Concurrence ·noun A common right; coincidence of equal powers; as, a concurrence of jurisdiction in two different courts.
concurrence
n.
1.
Conjuncture, combination, coincidence, consistence, consilience.
2.
Agreement, union, alliance, consent, joint approval or approbation.
3.
Co-operation.
Wikipedia
Concurrence
In Western jurisprudence, concurrence (also contemporaneity or simultaneity) is the apparent need to prove the simultaneous occurrence of both actus reus ("guilty action") and mens rea ("guilty mind"), to constitute a crime; except in crimes of strict liability. In theory, if the actus reus does not hold concurrence in point of time with the mens rea then no crime has been committed.
Examples of use of Concurrence
1. And the original majority becomes the concurrence.
2. What I now realise is that it is not really a form of concurrence at all.
3. Rumsfeld‘s directive said that Cambone‘s "concurrence" would be needed before any transfers.
4. "This faux judicial restraint is judicial obfuscation," Scalia wrote in a concurrence.
5. And with little hope for Senate concurrence, a House–passed measure on the subject would have only symbolic value.